Walsingham Publishing - King James Bible for Catholics

Published on The Feast of St. Theodore of Canterbury, Bishop, 19 September 2020!     A preview is available.

Order on Amazon with free Prime shipping USA Canada Australia Vatican Ireland France Germany Spain Japan
Volume I - Genesis to Ecclesiasticus $17.95 CDN$24.99 AUD$35.61 tbd tbd tbd tbd tbd ¥3,300
Volume II - Isaiah to Revelation $15.95 CDN$21.95 AUD$31.65 16,59 € £13.95 16,83 € 16,75 € 16,59 € ¥3,025
TOTAL for the Two-Volume Set $33.90 CDN$46.94 AUD$67.26 ¥6,325
Amazon is in the process of rolling this out.
If one or both volumes are not yet available in your territory, please try again later.

This is the full 1611 text of the Authorized Version of the most beloved and most published bible in the world. Designed for private devotional use by Catholics, all 80 books of the original 1611 edition are included. The 14 books not found in many later editions of the KJV have been included in the order Catholics expect within the 46 (not 39!) books of the Old Testament. As in the 1610 Douay, The Prayer of Manasses and the two additional Books of Esdras are placed in an Appendix. Then follow, of course, the 27 books of the New Testament.

With an Introduction by The Rev'd David Ousley, Ph.D.




Introduction

Why should Catholics be interested in the King James Version of the Bible? And why should there be enough Catholic interest to justify an edition of the KJV for Catholic readers?

First, the KJV is good English. When the translators were working on it, they first translated as accurately and carefully as they could, working in small groups. Then they read the texts out loud to one another. This was a translation intended to be read in church, and the English needed to read well and be heard well. This was the age of Shakespeare, when good English was valued and practiced. No doubt the language of the Church or of the Court was not that of the street. But even those in the street still recognized that Church and Court demanded a more elevated idiom, and valued it. Understanding of this idiom does not seem to have been an issue: Shakespeare was popular with all classes.

One result is that so many of the KJV’s memorable and felicitous translations have passed into the common heritage of the English language. The mote and the beam, “I will make you fishers of men,” “a man … shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh,” “Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.” Such examples are manifold.

In this regard, the English of the KJV is generally superior to most modern translations. How much better is “In my Father’s house are many mansions” than “… many rooms.” Or Isaiah’s vision of the seraphim: “Each one had six wings; with twain he covered his face, and with twain he covered his feet, and with twain he did fly.” Compare the Revised Standard Version: “… with two he covered his face, and with two he covered his feet, and with two he flew.”

Of course, good English would not matter a great deal unless the translation were also accurate. The KJV is a good, honest translation. Unlike many of the early Reformation translations, it is careful to avoid polemics. It was intended to be unifying for all the Protestant Christians in England (the particular requirements of Catholics were not considered).

It follows closely the Greek or Hebrew text. It is not “dynamic equivalence,” where the translator first decides what the text means and then renders his understanding of it in idiomatic English. That the KJV is instead a “literal” translation makes it useful for close study and as a basis for preaching. It is never a paraphrase and always bears close examination.

The desire for accuracy extends to places where the original Greek or Hebrew is ambiguous. Most modern translations pick what they think is the most likely meaning. But so far as possible, the KJV prefers to convey the ambiguity. For example, “the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not” (John 1:5). “Comprehend” carries with it the sense of understanding (the powers of darkness didn’t get it), and also that the Light cannot be enclosed, limited, confined, and that the darkness cannot overcome the Light. The KJV does not choose one meaning, but conveys something of the richness of the Greek.

The KJV uses “man” when that is what is in the text; it does not substitute “one” or use another generic circumlocution. Thus Psalm 1: “Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly … .” This allows us to see the Christological meaning which is obscured when the text is rendered, “Blessed are they …” as modern translations are apt to do.

The use of the singular and plural personal pronouns (thee, thou, thy, ye) allows us to know whether the original is singular or plural – which the English “you” does not. While thee and thou may seem archaic, this is actually very helpful, since it helps us to be clear about whom the pronoun refers to. For example, when the serpent tempts Eve (Genesis 3), he says to her, “Ye shall not surely die … ye shall be as gods.” Ye is plural, so it is not just Eve as an individual who is being tempted, but Eve in essential union with Adam: mankind. Eve acknowledges this as she also uses the plural. Using “you” rather than “ye” leaves us in doubt as to whether it is about Eve alone or the whole of humanity that is entering into temptation.

Accuracy is crucial in any translation, and few can rival the KJV.

These are reasons that any Christian might benefit from the KJV. This edition of the KJV for Catholic readers is occasioned by the establishment of the Ordinariates by Pope Benedict’s Apostolic Constitution, Anglicanorum coetibus (2009). The Ordinariates provide a structure for Anglicans and Episcopalians desiring to enter the communion of the Catholic Church. The KJV has had a decisive influence on the character of Christian worship in the English-speaking world, and thus on the Ordinariates. For over 400 years, Anglicans and most English-speaking Protestants heard, read, marked, learned, and inwardly digested Scripture from the KJV. It was so well established among the faithful that when the modern translations began to appear, and were often favored by those in positions of power, the lay faithful often objected. The arguments advanced in favor of a more modern idiom, and that the KJV was no longer “vernacular,” carried little weight.1

Its elegant and accurate cadences formed the hearts and minds of the Christian people, especially Anglicans. Along with the Book of Common Prayer, the KJV formed the vernacular in worship and prayer. Long before the Second Vatican Council endorsed the principle of using the vernacular in the liturgy, the vernacular of the BCP and KJV was well established among Anglicans, and is a key element of the Patrimony which the Ordinariates bring into the communion of the Catholic Church. The language forms our prayer and liturgical language. Although Divine Worship: The Missal has included texts from the KJV, the KJV as a whole has not been authorized for liturgical use. Anglicanorum coetibus recognizes that the Ordinariates bring particular gifts to the Catholic Church, and our experience with this liturgical vernacular is surely one of them.

The majority of those who have entered the Ordinariate of the Chair of Saint Peter were using the Book of Common Prayer and KJV before entering the Catholic Church. Such is now recognized as a key part of the Anglican formation which has led to communion with the Catholic Church. Interestingly, the liturgical reforms under Pope Paul VI led some Anglican liturgists to abandon the heritage of the BCP and KJV and adopt the language of the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite, feeling that this alone was “Catholic.” We are grateful that the Church has now affirmed the value of the traditional language, and sees that the Catholic Church can be enriched by it. This is historically fitting, since King James commissioned the translation to be used by all the Protestants in England. His ecumenical intent is now extended with this edition, making the KJV accessible to Catholics as well.

A few words are in order about this edition. This is a new printing of the full text of the 1611 KJV Bible with the 1769 orthographic changes, and substitutions for eight occurrences of an Anglicization of the Tetragrammaton, as explained in the Note on page iv. It is offered for the private use of Catholics. The books of the Old Testament have been restored to the order familiar to most English-speaking Catholics. Details are given in the Note on page viii. The original KJV separated the books which were not thought to be part of the Hebrew canon and included them as “Apocrypha” between the Old and New Testaments. Most contemporary printings of the KJV omit them entirely. These books (and the sections of Esther and Daniel) are now returned to their previous places in the Old Testament, as in the Vulgate. This will make it easier for Catholics to find their way around, especially should they be using this with the Ordinariate Daily Office.

The KJV has not been authorized for public worship in the Ordinariates, and thus this is not a “Catholic edition” of the KJV, but rather the KJV for Catholic readers. It is of course suitable for study, whether by individuals or in groups.

It is hoped that this edition of the King James Bible for Catholics will enrich the lives of many Catholics, far beyond the Ordinariates. It is also offered to the Catholic Church as one element of the Patrimony which the Ordinariates seek to share with the Church according to the exhortation of Pope Benedict XVI in Anglicanorum coetibus.

The Rev’d David Ousley, Ph.D.

Note on the Old Testament Canon

The Hebrew Bible or TaNaKh consists of 24 books: the 5 books of the Pentateuch, the 4 books of the Former Prophets (Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings), the 3 books of the Latter Prophets (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel), a single book of the Twelve Minor Prophets (Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi) and the 11 books of the Writings (Psalms, Proverbs, Job, Song of Songs, Ruth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, Esther, Daniel, Ezra and Nehemiah, and Chronicles). In Western Christian bibles, these 24 books are divided into 39 books, with the Minor Prophets counted as 12 books, and Ezra, Nehemiah, I/II Samuel, I/II Kings, and I/II Chronicles counted individually.

The Septuagint, the Greek Bible of the early Christians, included several additional books. Until the Council of Trent dogmatically affirmed in 1546 that the entire Latin Vulgate except for III and IV Esdras and the Prayer of Manasses enjoyed equal canonical status, there was no unanimity on the status of the books not included in the Hebrew Bible. When Saint Jerome translated the Greek and Hebrew bibles into Latin, he identified (a) “canonical books” recognized by the Jews, (b) “those that are read by Christians only,” and (c) “apocryphal books” rejected by Jews and Christians alike. Saint Augustine corresponded with Jerome between A.D. 394 and 405, with Augustine expressing reservations about use of the Hebrew text rather than exclusive reliance on the Greek. With respect to the canon, Augustine’s preference for the Septuagint prevailed, and all of the books Jerome had not listed as “Apocryphal” remained in the Vulgate. The legacy of Jerome’s opinion was long-lasting, most evident in the need for the Council of Trent to finalize the canon. Jerome’s placement of the Greek Additions to Esther at the end of the Hebrew text resulted in confusing verse and chapter numbering. This is clarified in the table of verse correspondences on the final page of the Book of Esther in this edition.

Following Jerome, the original 1611 King James Bible placed the books not in the Hebrew canon in a section between the Old and New Testaments called “The Apocrypha”, consisting of 14 books in the following order: I and II Esdras (called III and IV Esdras in the Vulgate and 1610 Douay), Tobit, Judith, The Rest of Esther (those portions which Jerome had removed from the body of Esther and placed at the end), The Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus (or The Wisdom of Jesus the son of Sirach), Baruch, The Song of the Three Holy Children (68 verses following Daniel 3:23 in Catholic bibles including this edition of the KJV), The History of Susanna (Chapter 13 of Daniel), Bel and the Dragon (Chapter 14 of Daniel), The Prayer of Manasses, and I and II Maccabees. See the Table of Contents for the restored order of these books. As in the 1610 Douay, the 3 non-canonical books appear separately.

This edition of the KJV has placed all of the Old Testament books in the order familiar to English-speaking Catholics. However, within the Catholic Church there is significant variation in the order of books. Catholic bibles not in English often use a different order. English-speaking Eastern Catholics use the Orthodox Study Bible, which includes additions used in the East. The Prayer of Manasses is placed at the end of II Chronicles. This is followed first by III Esdras, titled 1 Ezra, and then by the Book of Ezra used in the West, which is titled 2 Ezra. Nehemiah is next. The familiar books of 1 and 2 Maccabees are followed by 3 Maccabees, all following Esther rather than Malachi. The Book of Psalms includes a 151st Psalm. Isaiah through Daniel appear after, rather than before, the Minor Prophets, and there are several differences in order regarding the Deuterocanonical sections of Baruch and Daniel.

Questions and answers.

  • What is the King James Version for Catholics?

    The King James Version for Catholics is a new printing of the the full text, all 80 books, of the 1611 KJV Bible with the 1769 orthographic changes and with the Deuterocanonical books placed among the other books of the Old Testament in the order expected by Catholics.

  • You said "80 books." My Ignatius Catholic Bible only has 73. Can you elaborate further.

    As published in England in 1611, the KJV included 80 books, which correspond to, but are organized differently than the 76 books of the 1610 Douay.

    In a full, standard edition of the King James Bible there are 39 Old Testament books accepted by Jews and Protestants, four books that are deuterocanonical portions of Esther and Daniel, 7 deuterocanonical books, three books considered non-canonical but published in the KJV and early editions of the Douay, and the 27 books of the New Testament.

    The King James Version for Catholics will have all of these, in the accustomed Catholic order.

    Anglicans have always used all of the books, but other Protestants began printing editions of the KJV with only 66 books, omitting the 14 books in the KJV Apocrypha. With the transition to newer translations in the 1950s and 1960s by Catholics and Anglicans, it became more difficult to obtain complete versions of the KJV.

    Like the 1610 Douay, the three non-canonical books commonly included in bibles of the period, but not accounted as part of the deutero canon by the Council of Trent, will be included and placed in an appendix to the Old Testament.

    The three non-canonical books are The Prayer of Manasses, and 2 additional books of Esdras. Though non-canonical, the Second Book of Esdras (called the Fourth Book of Esdras in the pre-Tridentine Vulgate) is heavily used in liturgical propers within the Church, and the Prayer of Manasses has been used in the Liturgy of the Hours.

  • Why is this a King James Version for Catholics, and not a King James Version - Catholic Edition, as with the RSV?

    I am calling this the King James Version for Catholics rather than the King James Version Catholic Edition because any attempt to make significant modifications to the KJV would make it something different and inauthentic. However, I have reviewed the changes made to the RSV to create the RSV-CE. You may read my notes on that here.

    The only changes other than placing the books in the familiar order which I am planning are to follow the 2008 letter from the CDW, written at Pope Benedict's request, that asks that the Holy Name of God, the Tetragrammaton, be rendered in English as "The Lord" rather than "Jehovah". Jews stopped pronouncing the Tetragrammaton during the Second Temple Era, and early Christians also never attempted to prounounce the Holy Name. This will only affect eight verses in the entire KJV, and in each case a footnote will indicate the original text.

    In addition, there will be some small number of footnotes where the text differs significantly from current understanding of the original languages. But one of the features of the original KJV that made it different from other translations being produced at the time was the lack of marginal notes, which tended to be polemical attacks on other translations.

    So while an imprimatur might be nice, I will be happy if I am only able to find an author more learned than myself to write a preface discussing the proper place of the KJV in the life of the Ordinariate.

  • Isn't it full of errors?

    While Bibles produced by groups of Protestants issuing from the Continental Reformation often specifically use wording to deny Catholic doctrine, that is not the case with the King James Version, which was produced by "High Church" parties within Anglicanism under the direction of a monarch with strong Catholic leanings.

    In preparing this edition and deciding where to place footnotes, I have asked for assistance in identifying those "errors". Lists of purported errors have been provided. My answers to one such list show that the majority of so-called "errors" are language choices which the KJV shares with the Douay.

  • What prompted you to put the KJV for Catholics together?

    Many people have asked for it. It is certainly an important part of the patrimony. The King James Bible and the Book of Common Prayer, more than any other literary works, have formed the culture and the consciences of the English speaking people for over 400 years.

  • What difficulties are there, if any, in working on any Scriptural text in terms of Catholic approvals?

    Lectionaries, that is, books containing the individual readings for use in the Mass or at the daily office, must go through a rigorous approval process, and must follow the directives in Liturgiam Authenticam. However, Catholics are free to read any translation of the bible, whether the bible is being offered as a "Catholic" bible or not. I recommend that anyone reading the Bible, especially this edition, do so while consulting a good Catholic commentary. To be Catholic is to interpret the bible in the light of the Tradition of the Church:

    "[T]he task of authentically interpreting the Word of God, whether written or handed on, has been entrusted exclusively to the living teaching office of the Church, whose authority is exercised in the name of Jesus Christ. This teaching office is not above the Word of God, but serves it, teaching only what has been handed on, listening to it devoutly, guarding it scrupulously and explaining it faithfully in accord with a divine commission and with the help of the Holy Spirit; it draws from this one deposit of faith everything which it presents for belief as divinely revealed. -- Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation (Dei Verbum), 1965

    Many portions of the KJV have already received specific approval from the CDF/CDW and are incorporated in "Divine Worship: The Missal." For example, the Last Gospel must be read from the Missal, and the text printed in the missal is the KJV. Many of the minor propers and other scriptural texts in the Missal are also from the KJV. Publication of this edition of the KJV is being undertaken in the spirit of Pope Benedict XVI's vision "to maintain the liturgical, spiritual and pastoral traditions of the Anglican Communion within the Catholic Church, as a precious gift nourishing the faith of the members of the Ordinariate and as a treasure to be shared." (Anglicanorum Cœtibus III.)

  • What response have you had to the project so far?

    Many members of the Ordinariate coming from the Anglican tradition are enthusiastic. Others, who do not appreciate the more poetic nature of the KJV, don't understand why the Douay isn't good enough. There are also detractors who believe that the KJV is heretical or claim that it is a polemic against the Church, but no one has yet identified any passage that is in contradiction to Catholic doctrine. One person adamantly claimed that the KJV translation of John 3:16 is heretical, but that is one of the verses which has already received official approval from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith for use at Mass, as one of the "Comfortable Words" in the Penitential Office.

  • When will the two-volume set be available for order?

    Production is nearing completion on schedule, and ordering at Amazon.com should be available on or before The Feast of St. Theodore of Canterbury, Bishop, 19 September 2020.

  • Do you have a website for it yet?

    Here you are! Once available for purchase, this page will refer you to Amazon where it will be available with free Prime shipping. The price for the two volumes purchased together will be $33.90 in the USA, and will be similarly priced elsewhere.





Some specific portions of the KJV are approved for use at Mass. An example is shown on these missal pages below, along with the approval from Cardinal Sarah. No official KJV lectionary text is being considered as part of this project. Anything beyond publishing what is described on this page is Out-of-Scope at this time.


Preview of the KJV for Catholics.

John Covert, Acton, Massachusetts, USA